I can’t really digest all of our previous lessons because
just these weeks, I always have my early morning and late afternoon migraines..
Just like in my advanced Stat., we have our lesson on z-test and t-test for the
mean. These lessons need so much attentiveness in order for me to analyzed and
have the correct decision in my answer such as rejecting or not rejecting the
null hypotheses and on having my conclusion.
I just don’t really mind my migraine because I need to fully
understand our lesson.
Here is one of the problems that we had:
A researcher reports that the average salary of assistant
professors is more than $42,000. A sample of 30 assistant professors has a mean
salary of $43,260. At α=0.05,
test the claim that assistant professors earn more than $42,000 a year. The
standard deviation of the population is $5,230.
In order for us to answer problems like this, we should need
to follow these 5 steps:
Step 1: State the hypotheses and identify the claim.
Null Hypotheses (H0): µ ≤ $42,00 and
Alternative Hypotheses (H1): µ > $42,000 (claim)
Step 2: Find the critical value. Since α=0.05 and
the test is a right-tailed test, the critical value is z=1.65.
Step 3: Compute the test value.
Step 4: Make the decision. Since the test value, 1.32 is less than
the critical value 1.65, and is not in the critical region, the decision is “Do
not reject the null hypothesis”.
Step 5: Summarize the results. There is not enough evidence
to support the claim that assistant professors earns more on average than
$42,000 a year.
Even though the sample mean, $43,000, is higher than the
hypothesized population mean of $42,000, it is not significantly higher. Hence,
the difference may due to chance.
It should be noted that when the null hypothesis is not
rejected, it cannot be accepted as true. There is merely not enough evidence to
say that it is false. This guideline may sound a little confusing, but the
situation is analogous to a jury trial. The verdict is either guilty or not
guilty and is based on the evidence presented. If a person is judged not
guilty, it does not mean that the person is proved innocent; it only means that
there is enough evidence to reach the guilty verdict.
By: Kent Spencer M. Mendez